What next !!
One might think whats the Israe's goal in his pounding of Gaza with bombs and now ground assaults knowing the history of Israel's conflict with its neighbour and U.S. engagement in middle east. Lets assume Israel successfully finish this operation. And disarm, dismantel Hamas and its infrastructure and arrest or kill rest of its leader, what next?
Well there few possibilities:
1. Israel will handover the reings of Palastine to the defeated leader Fatah party Mahmood Abbas
2. After severly hurting Hamas, Israel will leave Palastine
3. Israel will occupy the territory
Well first possibility, Israel might hand over the reign of Palestine to Fatah's leader Mahmood Abbas who is seen as the west ally. Seen as an intellectual who is against war and currently the head of West Bank. U.S. has been strengthing his men with monetry help and with Israel using it a tool to crush Hamas. Something on the lines of Saddam Hussain, who was seen a modernist and got complete U.S. support to crush the Iranian influence after Ayatollah Khomeini led rvolution dethorned the US supported monarch Shah of Iran. It must be well noted that in the past Israel has attacked Fatah atleast 2 times for firing rocket in Israel. And let the Hamas grew during 1980s to reduce the influence of Fatah which can be said to be exactly opposite of what it is doing now. Well, arises the serious questions ? Whats the guaranty of security ? What has Israel or US achieved in the history by this support one and crush other policy ? This seems to be a never ending process.
Second option is Israel will hurt Hamas in and out, kill as many as it can agree on some kind of truce and leave the territory hurt. Will that ensure peace and security ? If not Hamas, after this brutal killing of people some else will rise. A human nature is go extreme when provoked, what Israel itself is doing after getting provoked by Hamas. Where in Israel people may support attack on Hamas, what opinion will people in Palestine made after killin of number of people.
Third is Israel will occupy the territory again ? Well unlikely though but its a possibilty. It will put more blockades and make more fences around Palestinian border if there is any space left. Blockades of development will more dispera in the region like before 2005, its already 80% unemployment rate, very densly populated and higly poor region. Well would that insure security and peace ? Or it would strengthen extrimist group even more in its fight to against Jewish state ?
It would have been better if Israel and international community had given, Hamas a little space to breath when it came to power in 2006 election. A democratically elected government ought to get some kind of respect from international community specially west. One point should be noted that, in its election card Hamas had ommitted the demand of destruction of Israel and reason for its victory was seen as corruption during Fatah's rule. But what happened following their victory was the sudden agression from West, stoping of aid, internation sanction, more blockeds from Israel. Israel should have let, 1st government of unoccupied Palestine to rule and engage them in talks, negotiate the peace and scurity of the region. But it went directly other way. And might be expecting some different result from what history has given. We are all watching.
Well there few possibilities:
1. Israel will handover the reings of Palastine to the defeated leader Fatah party Mahmood Abbas
2. After severly hurting Hamas, Israel will leave Palastine
3. Israel will occupy the territory
Well first possibility, Israel might hand over the reign of Palestine to Fatah's leader Mahmood Abbas who is seen as the west ally. Seen as an intellectual who is against war and currently the head of West Bank. U.S. has been strengthing his men with monetry help and with Israel using it a tool to crush Hamas. Something on the lines of Saddam Hussain, who was seen a modernist and got complete U.S. support to crush the Iranian influence after Ayatollah Khomeini led rvolution dethorned the US supported monarch Shah of Iran. It must be well noted that in the past Israel has attacked Fatah atleast 2 times for firing rocket in Israel. And let the Hamas grew during 1980s to reduce the influence of Fatah which can be said to be exactly opposite of what it is doing now. Well, arises the serious questions ? Whats the guaranty of security ? What has Israel or US achieved in the history by this support one and crush other policy ? This seems to be a never ending process.
Second option is Israel will hurt Hamas in and out, kill as many as it can agree on some kind of truce and leave the territory hurt. Will that ensure peace and security ? If not Hamas, after this brutal killing of people some else will rise. A human nature is go extreme when provoked, what Israel itself is doing after getting provoked by Hamas. Where in Israel people may support attack on Hamas, what opinion will people in Palestine made after killin of number of people.
Third is Israel will occupy the territory again ? Well unlikely though but its a possibilty. It will put more blockades and make more fences around Palestinian border if there is any space left. Blockades of development will more dispera in the region like before 2005, its already 80% unemployment rate, very densly populated and higly poor region. Well would that insure security and peace ? Or it would strengthen extrimist group even more in its fight to against Jewish state ?
It would have been better if Israel and international community had given, Hamas a little space to breath when it came to power in 2006 election. A democratically elected government ought to get some kind of respect from international community specially west. One point should be noted that, in its election card Hamas had ommitted the demand of destruction of Israel and reason for its victory was seen as corruption during Fatah's rule. But what happened following their victory was the sudden agression from West, stoping of aid, internation sanction, more blockeds from Israel. Israel should have let, 1st government of unoccupied Palestine to rule and engage them in talks, negotiate the peace and scurity of the region. But it went directly other way. And might be expecting some different result from what history has given. We are all watching.
posted by Tanuj at 10:50 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home